Publishing A Research Paper

Publishing A Research Paper-47
But be selective too, for not getting to much deviated from you topic of interest.

Tags: Closing Paragraph For Scholarship EssayMarijuana Argument EssayResearch Paper WebEssay On My Parents And MeYale Architecture ThesisWitness For The Prosecution EssayMaths For Grade 3 Problem SolvingChegg.Com Homework SolutionsEssay On Pleasure Of Reading BooksThesis In Tourism Planning

Conferences offer rapid time-to-publish, plus you will often get feedback on your work when you present it.

Page lengths and acceptance standards vary widely from conference to conference, but generally conference papers are shorter than full journal papers.

The more you go, you'll notice that the bits of random thoughts start to come together and form a pattern, which may be a bright enough for a good paper. Simulation softwares easies Please don't pick overly ambitious topics; instead identify a realistic size problem. The procedure As a part of your paper publication, you can start documenting the 'existing techniques' from the scrap journal you did during the studies. Only a small proportion, 5 to 10 percent, are accepted the first time they are submitted, and usually they are only accepted subject to revision.

Gather the Matlab files available in the Internet that is related to your topic and simulate it for the claimed results. Here you have to extract what all are the techniques existing as a solution for the particular problem and the pros and cons of those. State your contributions'Abstract' is one section you can work on in the last, as it has to cover the all the sections very briefly. In fact, anything aside from simply "reject," Neal-Barnett reminds, is a positive review.

And Many of the students who will apply for further studies in technical courses will discover that relevant published research papers help during admission process.

So here we are trying to post some guidelines that you can follow... Preliminary The first activity for publishing a technical paper is to figure out your technical area of interest.Please don't expect the Mfiles readily available for a solution published in a paper. Next, document the 'introduction' about what is the topic and what you are going to do. Follows your contribution and the simulated results. Please note that Abstract makes the committee members to decide whether or not to read your paper. These include: * Accept: "Which almost nobody gets," she says.But you can make it of your own by modifying and adding. Once you are able to get the simulated outputs of your solution, you can carry on for making a paper out of it. Essence of your work The essence of your work can be diagnosed by analyzing below listed points. * Accept with revision: "Just make some minor changes." * Revise and resubmit: "They're still interested in you!We can increase the maturity of the paper by improving these. Did you solve an important problem of current interest or is it an obscure or obsolete problem? " * Reject and resubmit: Though not as good as revise and resubmit, "they still want the paper!Originality/Novelty: Is your approach novel or is it tried-and-true? "[2] Read every criticism as a positive suggestion for something you could explain more clearly 14.Did you need to develop new tools, either analytical or physical? Don't panic After reading the review the first time, put it aside.Completeness: Have you tested a wide range of scenarios, or is this just a simple proof-of-concept? Anatomy of Paper Generally a paper has seven sections and a maximum of four pages. Come back to it later, reading the paper closely to decide whether the criticisms were valid and how you can address them.Correct: Is your solution technically sound or are there errors? You will often find that reviewers make criticisms that are off-target because they misinterpreted some aspect of your paper.If so, don't let it get to you -- just rewrite that part of your paper more clearly so that the same misunderstanding won't happen again.It's frustrating to have a paper rejected because of a misunderstanding, but at least it's something you can fix. Be Positive If your paper is rejected, keep trying!On the other hand, criticisms of the content of the paper may require more substantial revisions -- rethinking your ideas, running more tests, or redoing an analysis. Take the reviews to heart and try to rewrite the paper, addressing the reviewer's comments.


Comments Publishing A Research Paper

The Latest from ©