Tags: Art Comparison Essay ConclusionsCauses Of Teenage Suicide Research PaperSpare The Rod And Save The Child EssayCompare Contrast Essay InstructionsCustom House Essay HawthorneWrite Analogy EssaysFeasibility Studies And The Establishment Of A Business Case For A ProjectNuclear Weapons Term Paper
Trial by Jury"Trial by jury" is a "trial by the country" In my opinion, trial by jury is the best way to achieve justice because rather than one man judging the accused there are 12 men who will be judging.In addition, trial by jury prevents oppression by the government.Judges are not as broad as the juries are, even though judges have more knowledge of the law then jurors.
Citizens are expected to understand the rules that our government has presented to us, abide by these rules for our own well being and freedom, and serve our communities and government back.
In 1789, the Constitution of the United States was ratified.
However, this essay looks to identify the disadvantages of using jurors in the criminal justice process.
It can be said from the outset that a number of issues arise, which arguably compromise their role to a certain extent.
A jury is comprised of jurors, whose purpose is to render a verdict submitted to them by a court.
This "trial by peers" approach has stood the test of time and has been long established.
Since the government has no right to control the selection of the jurors, there are not jurors who will do what they want them to do.
For instance, some times government might want to put some one in jail because he/she might be a threat to them so they chose some juries who will vote guilty and then the accused would be serving unnecessary punishment.
The question here is not whether this was the correct verdict or not, but that the verdict was reached through internal influence rather than direction by the judge and evidence.
Finally, through the case of R v West, the extensive coverage of the case by the media arguably compromised the defendant’s right to a fair trial.